Following the Fire of Shavu’ot
There is a trail in Utah called Catherine’s Pass that my husband and I love to hike. It begins near the Alta Ski Area. At about 8,500 ft in elevation, the trailhead begins already high in the mountains.
The following essay is adapted from part one of a two part message series I recently shared at Friends Community Church. It has been revised here for readers beyond that setting, though the heart of the teaching remains the same.
There is a trail in Utah called Catherine’s Pass that my husband and I love to hike. It begins near the Alta Ski Area. At about 8,500 ft in elevation, the trailhead begins already high in the mountains. At first, the trail is mostly switchbacks and loose rock. Your lungs burn quickly in the elevation, and you cannot yet see where you are going. The mountain does not reveal itself all at once. You simply keep walking, trusting that if you remain on the trail long enough, eventually it will open into something beautiful.
And it does.
A bend in the path suddenly reveals a valley scattered with wildflowers. Meltwater streams through the rocks. Snow often still clings to the mountain in July.
A couple miles in, you crest a ridge into what I have always called Buttercup Valley, one of the most breathtaking places on the hike. Yellow wildflowers dot the valley floor. Indian paintbrush and lupine paint the slopes with color. Sometimes you see bighorn sheep or moose moving quietly in the distance. It’s a breathtaking part of the trail, and a needed meander through a meadow before the trail climbs again.
Eventually Catherine’s Pass opens before you, and suddenly the whole landscape stretches out in every direction.
But here’s the thing about hiking: someone could be dropped there by helicopter and still see the view. They would still witness the beauty of the mountains. But they’d miss the trail.
And the trail is the whole point.
They would miss the exhaustion of the climb, the anticipation around every bend, and the strange way suffering and beauty begin to intertwine after enough miles on the mountain. The trail changes your relationship to the summit.
Without the trail, you miss the story that makes the summit mean something.
I think this has happened for many Christians with Pentecost.
Most believers know Acts 2. We know about the rushing wind, the divided tongues of fire, the Spirit descending upon the disciples, and the proclamation of the gospel in many languages. It is one of the most dramatic scenes in the New Testament. But many of us encounter Acts 2 as though we were dropped there by helicopter. We arrive at the summit often without ever learning the trail that leads to it.
But Pentecost—Shavu’ot—is not merely an event in Acts. It is a trail of holy fire that climbs through Scripture. The story begins long before the disciples gather in Jerusalem.
Shavu’ot begin with a fire at a gate. The trail of Shavu’ot begins in Eden.
Eden
In the opening pages of Genesis, humanity lives openly in the presence of God. Heaven and earth overlap. The Spirit of God moves among humanity in the garden in the windy time of the day, and there is no barrier between divine holiness and human life. But one day, something fractures. The ruach shows up and realizes right away, something’s broken. The presence that once sustained humanity becomes dangerous to those no longer fit to dwell within it. Humanity is driven east of Eden, and at the entrance to the garden God places cherubim and a flaming sword turning in every direction to guard the way to the tree of life.
The fire at Eden is a holy boundary is being maintained. A broken humanity cannot simply casually reunite with God. And so the fire remains at the gate, guarding the way back into the presence of God.
It’s a loss.
From that moment onward, the biblical story begins asking a single question: How do we get back through the fire?
Sinai
For a long time, the answer to that question appears to be you don’t. You do not go back through the fire. You do not ascend the mountain of God.
For generations, humanity remains, wandering, east of Eden. The world continues spiraling outward into violence, exile, and death. Yet eventually God calls Abraham, raises up Israel, and rescues his people from Egypt through judgment and deliverance. Then he brings them into the wilderness, to the foot of a mountain wrapped in smoke and flame.
At Sinai, something astonishing happens: the fire comes down.
The imagery deliberately echoes Eden. Once again there is a holy mountain. Once again there are boundaries around sacred space. Once again humanity stands before the terrifying presence of God. But this time the story changes in an important way. At Eden, humanity is driven away from the mountain of God. At Sinai, God invites humanity toward it.
“Adonai said to Moses, “Go to the people, and sanctify them today and tomorrow. Let them wash their clothing. 11 Be ready for the third day. For on the third day Adonai will come down upon Mount Sinai in the sight of all the people. 12 You are to set boundaries for the people all around, saying, ‘Be very careful not to go up onto the mountain, or touch the border of it....But when the shofar sounds, they may ascend the mountain.” Exodus 19:10-13
Notice that the people were to:
consecrate themselves, set themselves apart for something very special
count the days—today, tomorrow, be ready for the third day, and on the third day
prepare themselves
listen for the shofar sound… then ascend
At Sinai, God invites them to ascend through the fire. The God who once guarded the mountain now calls a people toward it.
“So it came about on the third day, when it was morning, that there were thunder and lightning flashes and a thick cloud upon the mountain and a very loud shofar sound, so that all the people who were in the camp trembled. And Moses brought the people out of the camp to meet God, and they stood at the foot of the mountain. Now Mount Sinai was all in smoke because the LORD descended upon it in fire; and its smoke ascended like the smoke of a furnace, and the whole mountain quaked violently.” Exodus 19:16-18
When the mountain begins to quake and burn, the people recoil in fear. They tremble at the thunder and stand at a distance, begging Moses to mediate instead. “Do not let God speak to us,” they say, “lest we die.”
And so they . . .
see the fire
count the days
hear the shofar
but they refuse to draw near to God. Moses alone enters the thick cloud. One man ascends the mountain while the people remain at a distance.
This occurs roughly fifty days after leaving Egypt. Fire descends from heaven. The covenant is cut, God forms a people, but they are not so sure they want to be formed. What is God to do with a people who he wants to be near, but are not sure they want to be near him?
The answer: he teaches them how to approach.
Tent
Alongside the tent in the wilderness, God gives Israel something remarkable: a sanctuary in time.
The appointed times of Leviticus 23 are not random holidays. They are holy meeting times—moedim—when God invites his people to enter into a sanctuary in time and be near him. They are rehearsals—sacred rhythms teaching Israel how to live within the story of redemption before its fullness arrives. Every feast becomes a kind of embodied prophecy. Shabbat, Passover, Unleavened Bread, Firstfruits, Shavu’ot, Trumpets, Day of Atonement, Sukkot—each one teaches Israel how to remember, anticipate, and move toward the presence of God and join him in what he is doing in the world.
At Shavu’ot, Israel is commanded to count seven weeks from Firstfruits. Fifty days. Then they are to bring before the Lord two great loaves of leavened bread made from the firstfruits of the wheat harvest.
The imagery here is extraordinary.
At Passover, leaven is removed from Israel’s homes as they remember deliverance from Egypt. Later, they will start a new culture of leaven, trusting it will become strong enough to raise the bread. And in the meantime, they count. They prepare. They eat the barley grain and trust that the choice grain—the wheat harvest—will soon come. Then, about two months later, it arrives. At Shavu’ot, fully baked, beautiful loaves of leavened, golden bread are lifted before God..
Jewish tradition holds that the bread was waved forward and backward, upward and downward, declaring that the God of Israel rules over all creation. Can you hear the echoes of Eden? At the gates of the garden, the flaming sword flashed in every direction guarding the way back into the presence of God. But now, bread from the thorny ground is lifted in every direction before him in worship.
The God who once guarded Eden with fire now invites humanity to approach the fire at the altar, at the door of the tent, waving the fruit of the earth itself before him.
Into this story, Jesus steps. “I am the bread of life!” He declares that even outside of Eden, the wheat still grows. Bread still rises and through these sacred rhythms, God teaches his people to recognize every firstfruit as a sign that exile will not last forever. That is what firstfruits are throughout Scripture: signs that more is coming.
The bread matters because it reminds us the harvest is real. Much more fruit is surely on the way.
Exile
The tabernacle eventually becomes a temple. The fiery glory of God fills his house. Jerusalem becomes the center of worship and sacrifice. But the human hear is still fractured. Violence, oppression, idolatry, and injustice continue poisoning the land until eventually the prophets begin warning that exile is coming once again.
Then the unthinkable happens. In Ezekiel’s vision, the glory of God rises from the temple and departs from Jerusalem. The divine fire leaves God’s house. The story circles painfully back the gate outside of Eden again. Once again humanity stands outside sacred space.
The people of God find themselves scattered, exiled, and the land that once provided the harvest of the firstfruits to be celebrated in the sancturary in time lies desolate and forsaken.
But the prophets refuse to despair.
Ezekiel promises that God will give his people a new heart and place his Spirit within them (Eze. 36:26-27). Isaiah declares that the Spirit of God will not depart forever (Is. 59:21). Joel envisions a day when the Spirit will be poured out lavishly upon all flesh (Joel 2:28-29). What starts in Israel will renew the whole world.
These promises are not abstract spirituality or private religious experiences. They are covenant promises. They are the restoration of the bride God married at Sinai, under that veil of thick cloud and fiery glory. The prophets foresee a day when the breath that moved through Eden will once again fill all creation with life.
The restoration of Israel becomes the beginning of something larger, where those among the nations streaming upward toward the mountain of God. Gentiles willingly ascending saying “Come on! Let’s go! Let’s ascend the mountain of God so that we can learn his instructions.”
Learning to Walk the Trail
We may wonder, when does this happen? When will God pour out his Spirit? When do we reach the summit of this trail?
Shavu’ot is a trail of holy fire moving steadily toward restoration. From Eden, to Sinai, to the tabernacle and temple, to the prophets longing for the Spirit to return, the fire keeps drawing near.
And all along the trail, there are signs of the harvest. Little glimpses. Firstfruits. Pockets of golden buttercups at the foot of the long grind to the summit we can’t yet see. Moments where creation seems to whisper:
There is more coming.
Keep walking.
Stay on the trail.
The story is not over yet.
That’s what Shavu’ot is. It is a rehearsal of hope.
Shavu’ot is a trail of holy fire that awakens us to the firstfruits of a coming harvest.
Walking this trail strengthens our bodies, our souls. It’s training us how to follow the cloud by day, the fire by nigh—until the harvest yet to come arrives in full. We can continue to follow the fire into the New Testament. We’ll look at Acts 2, and keeping following the fire even from there. Because even Acts 2 isn’t the full harvest—it’s just the beginning of what God is doing for Israel and for the nations. And we are invited by God to join him in that work.
Until then, may we become a people who learn how to walk the trail, who learn how to count the days.
To lift the bread. To keep following the fire and practicing hope.
Because every Shabbat, every festival, every act of worship, every small movement toward the presence of God is training us for the kingdom and the world that is coming.
A world where:
the exile ends,
the tent is filled,
the mountain is ascended,
the gate of Eden is wide open,
and the Spirit of God fills the earth like breath in living lungs.
Until then—we must to learn to live as people of the firstfruits. People who are disciplined enough turn towards this story and ask God tohelp us follow the fire that fills his house and opens our eyes to all he is doing.
Hanging Beside a King
There is a moment that seems to come, sooner or later, in every conversation about salvation. It comes when the questions stop being about ideas and start being about names. Theology slips out of the big words and sits down beside us, wearing the face of someone we love.
There is a moment that seems to come, sooner or later, in every conversation about salvation. It comes when the questions stop being about ideas and start being about names. Theology slips out of the big words and sits down beside us, wearing the face of someone we love.
“But are they really saved?”
The person in question is almost always a loved one—a close friend or family member who perhaps has made some sort of profession of faith, or been recently baptized, or at least begun attending church regularly, but who has yet to show a life marked by change.
“She gave her life to Christ, but in the months since, there’s been little visible growth. She used to pray and go to church, but now she’s just drifting from God and I’m so worried!”
All of this comes tumbling out in Bible study or a home group. Tangled up in fear, hope, and panic-stricken confusion, someone listening reaches for the story that has soothed a thousand anxious hearts:
“Well, remember the thief on the cross.”
Relief floods the room. The thief. The last-minute miracle. The proof that faith can be simple and the reassurance that God doesn’t require too much of us, especially if the end is near.
No one in the room bothers to go look up the story and read it aloud. They don’t need to. They’ve memorized a one-liner that has stood the test of time: a common criminal, ignorant of God, ignorant of Scripture, ignorant of Jesus—who, in his final moments, whispers a simple “I believe” and slips quietly into paradise.
It’s a good story; gentle, merciful, and comforting to many a worried friend by someone who sincerely wants to help.
But it is almost certainly false.
Not a Clueless Convert
The thief on the cross comes to most Evangelicals as a man with a spiritually blank slate—a random sinner who happened to be in the right place at the right time. “Praise God he heard the gospel and believed before he died!” we say.
Historically, that’s an unlikely scenario. Rome did not crucify pickpockets. Crucifixion was typical for traitors, rebels, and insurrectionists—men who had become a problem for the empire. This sentence was a common one for Zealots, who raised much internal havoc in Israel in the days of Jesus. Whatever else this man was, he was not harmless. More importantly, he was not theologically illiterate.
Listen again to what he actually says:
“We are receiving the due reward of our deeds… but this man has done nothing wrong… Jesus, remember me when you come into your kingdom.” Luke 23:41-42
Those are loaded words coming from a man who is not grasping at straws in the dark.
· He believes Jesus is a king—and not the sort who merely reigns in hearts, but one whose rule can be entered.
· He believes Jesus will still receive a kingdom, even though he’s dying on the stake right next to him.
· He believes Jesus’ story does not end at death. This man has a category for understanding the impossibility of a life beyond the grave.
· And he believes Jesus has authority to include others in this future.
This is not the content of “simple faith.” This is eschatological, messianic faith.
This man is making a Jewish, hope-soaked confession at the worst possible moment to do so. And he can do this because he is not starting from nothing. The simple-minded thief we cherish actually seems to possess a robust set of expectations about God, kingship, and the future of the world. He already has a framework for these claims.
“Remember me” is Covenant Language
In the Scriptures, God “remembers” when he is about to act to keep his promises, rescue people, or restore order to his world. God remembers Noah. He remembers Abraham. He remembers Israel in Egypt, the prayers of Hannah. To be remembered is to be delivered; to be gathered back into the story when redemption is finally on the brink of occurring.
What this man is really saying is something like: When God vindicates you and your kingdom finally comes, let me be counted as yours.
And notice where he wants to be remembered: in your kingdom.
He does not seem primarily concerned with his own salvation or his destination in the moments following his death. He’s concerned with belonging to a very real and specific future in this world—a kingdom associated with the reign of God finally setting the world right. This is a stubborn faith that says: God is not finished yet. Not with you. Not with Israel. Not with the world. And not with me.
We have no way of knowing this man’s ethnic background for certain, but it is very possible that he was Jewish, or at the very least, someone very familiar with the Jewish hope that was electrifying Israel in those years: “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is near.”
The backdrop of his crucifixion is Passover in Jerusalem. In that setting, this man…
acknowledges Jesus’ innocence
rebukes the other criminal
publicly aligns himself with a condemned “messianic pretender”
and entrusts himself to Jesus’ future reign.
That is repentance in the deepest biblical sense: a total change of allegiance.
The Courage to Defect
As hard as it is for my worried friends to accept, this is not a story about a man who knows nothing about God or Jesus and stumbles his way to salvation at the last minute.
It is a story about a man who, at the very end of his life, chooses sides—sides he probably had at least some familiarity with long before his crucifixion.
It’s true: he does not have time to make restitution, join a crew of disciples, keep the Torah better, or fix his life.
But he does repent.
While everyone else is mocking or denying Jesus, he does something astonishing: he entrusts himself to a dying king of a not-yet-visible kingdom.
He publicly defects to Jesus’ side when Jesus looks least like a winner—and when he himself has no hope of Jesus fixing anything regarding his current circumstances.
I think, if he had lived, everything suggests that this new allegiance would have recalibrated his entire life.
Somewhere along the way, we turned this story into proof that biblical literacy and repentance don’t really matter. The thief is our evidence that simple faith is what counts most, and living righteously or having some understanding the Jesus we give our lives to doesn’t count much in the end.
“Just believe in Jesus,” we say—without asking what belief in Jesus means, what we think he’s asking of us, or what kind of kingdom we imagine he brings.
I don’t think the thief believed in a vague, generic savior ready to carry him off to heaven. It seems to me he believed in a dying Messiah, a rejected king, and an invisible kingdom that would—against all appearances—still come, in the very city where he was nailed to a stake on a hill.
His faith, it seems, was anchored in that hope.
Stealing from the Thief
The poor thief on the cross.
We have left him there, hanging beside a king, forever enthroning a story about simple faith instead of the identity of the man who died beside him.
We’re afraid of our own shortcomings, worried for the people we love who confess without real allegiance. We’re so desperate to avoid being held accountable to worshipping a God we know, we become thieves ourselves—guilty of stealing the testimony of a repentant rebel and recycling him into a clueless criminal who “got saved” at the last second by a kind king who asks almost nothing.
It’s a retelling that exposes something about the condition of our own hearts.
Maybe we are all just thieves, hanging beside a king on crosses of our own—looking at the crucified man next to us, and deciding what we want him to be.
I usually let these conversations run their course. I save my thoughts for another time, perhaps, when people are less panicked. I’ll try, as gently and honestly as I can, to recover what’s been lost. Maybe they’ll see.
In our doubts and questions, I think we are finally standing where the story has always placed us: at the place of the skull—sifting through the rubble of what we think we know, trying to see who the man in the middle really is.
And just hoping, like the thief, that he will look down from his throne one day and remember us.
An Offering of Words
I wrote The Forgotten Gospel by accident. One blustery November afternoon, I sat down to prepare notes for a Bible study on Leviticus—nothing more. Just an inner determination to understand a difficult book of the Bible well enough to help others through it.
I wrote The Forgotten Gospel by accident.
One blustery November afternoon, I sat down to prepare notes for a Bible study on Leviticus—nothing more. No outline or book proposal. No vision for a manuscript. Just an inner determination to understand a difficult book of the Bible well enough to help others through it.
My notes kept growing.
What I thought would be a couple pages became five, then ten. I remember looking up a few hours later and realizing I hadn’t prepared a lesson. I had stumbled into the early pages of a book.
Weeks of writing turned into months. I kept going.
At 20,000 words, I began to think this project might be worth finishing. At 30,000, I became acutely aware that I had no idea what I was doing.
So I did what I have always done when I find myself in unfamiliar territory. I read a book about it.
I studied structure, pacing, argument, tone. Having never written anything so long, I had to learn how to shape something cohesive out of something that had, until then, simply been pouring out.
At 65,000 words, I decided I needed help—an editor.
I didn’t know where to find one, or what that process looked like, but step by step I figured it out. I cut the manuscript down—too much, as it turned out—and nervously sent it to someone who was far more qualified than I was.
What came back was humbling. Pages of thoughtful feedback and rigorous queries left me a bit overwhelmed. My editor argued with nearly every point, which was exactly what I needed. His criticism forced me to see both the strengths and the gaps in what I had written.
So I went back in. I restored what I had cut too quickly and rebuilt the introduction from the ground up. I battled with chapter nine, again.
Notes became paragraphs. Paragraphs became the appendix I never planned to include. I wrote it in two days, a feat that still amazes me.
I wrote until there was nothing left to say. Slowly, a manuscript began to emerge.
By then, the project was no longer an accident.
It had become an offering.
An Offering of Words
At some point I made the decision to write something real—something serious, something weighty. Something worthy of the people who would read it. And something worthy of giving to the Most High God.
The accident became an offering of words.
Writing, as I quickly realized, was only part of the work. I needed a design that did right by the project. I needed to make publishing decisions, to seek endorsements, to place my work into the hands of influential people who did not know me and had every reason to dismiss everything I said.
And many did.
Doors closed. Emails went unanswered. Some did not take me seriously.
But others did. People from unexpected places—scholars, pastors, thoughtful authors and teachers—were willing to read and engage with the work I had done. When they emerged from it’s pages, their feedback made something very clear to me.
I had written something that, by God’s grace, was already beginning to serve others.
This book is not a product. It’s an offering. I trust that if these words carry weight, they will find their way into the hands of those who need them.
That principle is why I chose to publish this book independently. I wanted the freedom to be able to give it away electronically to those who lack the means to purchase it, a desire a traditional publisher may have found difficult to accommodate. I invite anyone who is moved by the same spirit of generosity to support this work so that it can continue.
God is faithful to multiply what is given back to him. While I have labored to shape this book, the words themselves are not mine. They are a gift I am humbled to be entrusted with.
The Fruit of a Curious Heart and a Gracious God
Everything about The Forgotten Gospel is, in its own way, a blessed accident.
I didn’t begin with answers or a plan. I started with questions about Leviticus, sacrifice, the temple. About how to make a book people dread come alive for the those gathered in my living room each week. I needed to know how its authority harmonizes with Jesus and his mission, not in vague or symbolic ways, but in the way he saw it.
More than anything, I wanted to hear the voice of Leviticus itself.
I didn’t want to make it fit a framework I had already decided was true. I wanted to understand what it was saying—and why so few of us are willing to listen.
So I kept asking.
Over time, asking became searching. Searching became studying. Studying—over years now—grew into understanding.
Then the words came. I wrote them down.
But the truth is I should never have made it this far.
I am no one remarkable. I have no formal training in the upper echelons of theology or a ministry platform on which to stand.
And yet—this seems to be the way of God. He delights in blessing the accidents. He strengthens those who have no strength of their own. He entrusts things to the ones no one expects.
The Forgotten Gospel is not the product of credentials. It is the fruit of a curious heart and a merciful God who refused to leave me behind.
It took years for me to see that Leviticus is not a detour in the story of redemption, but a window into the very heart of what God is doing—and will yet do.
In the end, the words just came as they always do.
Unbidden. Unforced. Already forming inside me long before they ever reached the page.
Sometimes the work we never intend to do becomes the burden we are asked to carry.
Laid Down in Gratitude
I have carried these words a long way—
from where they first began
to where they now come to rest.
I lay them down on the altar of this frail and earthly frame,
in gratitude—an offering to the One who first gave them.
May they rise, to you oh Lord,
and find favor in your sight.
Why I Wrote a Book About Leviticus (Of All Things)
If you had asked me a few years ago—hypothetically—what book of the Bible I would one day write about, Leviticus would not have made the list. Not even close.
If you had asked me a few years ago—hypothetically—what book of the Bible I would one day write about, Leviticus would not have made the list.
Not even close.
Leviticus is the book most of us skim or skip entirely. It’s where Bible reading plans go to die somewhere around mid-February. It’s strange, repetitive, and heavy with details that don’t seem to connect to modern faith.
Yet there it sits at the very center of the Torah, the center of Israel’s Scriptures, and the center of the story that defines Jesus.
So why write a book about it?
The short answer is this: I came to see that Leviticus is essential to the gospel, and I couldn’t not share what I had learned.
Jesus said he came to fulfill the Torah—and Leviticus is at the heart of it.
In Matthew 5:17, Jesus says:
“Do not think that I have come to abolish the Torah or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.”
It’s a familiar verse. One we tend to read and nod along with, and then move past.
But I began to wonder: do we actually take Jesus at his word?
Because if he did not come to abolish the Torah, then we have to wrestle with what it means that he came to fulfill it. And that question becomes especially pressing when we arrive at Leviticus—the book that sits at the center of the Torah’s main tension: how can a holy God dwell among unholy people?
Leviticus is not a side note. It is the core of the good news. It’s where we learn what it means for a holy God to draw near to unholy people—what that looks like and what it costs to make it possible.
And when you start paying attention, you begin to notice something: Jesus lives and speaks as if Leviticus still matters.
He operates within categories of clean and unclean.
He spends a huge amount of time in and around the temple.
He is deeply moved by the fate of Jerusalem—the place of God’s dwelling.
And he seems to believe that its story is not over.
That realization alone was enough to stop me in my tracks.
“Fulfilled” does not mean “replaced”—and that changes how we read everything.
Somewhere along the way, many of us inherited an assumption: that once Jesus came, Leviticus—and much of the Torah—was effectively finished.
Not abolished, exactly. But completed (past tense) in a way that no longer holds real weight. As though Jesus arrived, died, rose again, and poof—the Torah was fulfilled and done. But the more I sat with Jesus’ words, the less that assumption held up.
He goes on to say that those who set aside even the least of these commandments—and teach others to do the same—will be called least in the kingdom. To me, that didn’t sound like a system that’s been rendered irrelevant.
And it raised uncomfortable questions:
If Leviticus is“fulfilled” by him basically doing away with it, why insist he didn’t come to abolish it?
If the Torah is complete and already behind us, why warn against setting its commands aside?
That tension forced me to ask deeper questions: what if I’ve been reading all of this wrong?
That shift changed everything.
Instead of reading Leviticus as a dry relic—something that once mattered but no longer does—I began to read it for what it was actually saying. I tried to see it as Jesus did: a framework that points forward. One that finds its depth and future in the work of Messiah, but is not discarded by him. I asked,
What if the categories still matter?
What if the vision still matters?
What if the priesthood, the sacrifices, the rhythms of worship all still matter?
And what if its story is still unfolding?
Suddenly, Leviticus became impossible to ignore. I began to realize that a book that was central to the life and mission of my Savior was not central to me.
That needed to change.
I had questions no one seemed to be answering.
Once those first two realizations settled in, they opened up a flood of questions.
If Leviticus still matters, how does it matter?
If it hasn’t been replaced, how should we read it now?
What do we do with sacrifice, priesthood, ritual, the Day of Atonement?
How did Jesus understand these things? And how did his first followers hold these things alongside faith in him?
And what about the New Testament? The temple?
Paul, Galatians, Hebrews? The new covenant? “You’re free from the Law!” I went looking for answers.
I read books, articles, and journals. I listened to sermons and podcasts. I took classes. I searched for voices asking these same questions. And I found…very little.
There were excellent scholars writing about Leviticus in its ancient context. There were thoughtful theologians explaining how Jesus relates to the law. But usually, the conversation seemed to stop too soon. Leviticus was either reduced to metaphor, absorbed into church tradition, or ultimately dismissed as something Jesus came to transcend.
None of them could answer the question I was asking: what does it mean to take Jesus at his word—that he didn’t come to abolish the Torah—and take Leviticus seriously at the same time?
I couldn’t shake the sense that Jesus didn’t read Leviticus the way I did. He didn’t stand over it, deciding how he’d render it all obsolete. He stepped into it. He let it shape his mission. His identity. His understanding of what he came to do—and what God is still doing.
For him.
For the Jewish people.
And for the world.
And that left me with a decision. I could set those questions aside, or I could follow them wherever they led.
So I wrote the book I couldn’t find.
I didn’t start with a plan to write a book.
I started with a growing, gnawing sense that I had missed something.
So I began tracing the threads, from Leviticus into the Prophets, the Gospels, and the letters. From the tent at Sinai to the heavenly tabernacle still destined, one day, to descend to the land.
I stopped trying to read Leviticus backwards—starting with conclusions about Jesus and forcing the text to fit them—and instead tried to read it the way Jesus knew it: as a living part of the story he was stepping into.
What I found was not a disconnected system of ancient rituals that Jesus replaced with himself at the cross. I found a vision of a people and a tent that are at the very center of everything God still intends to do.
And I found that without Leviticus, I completely misunderstood almost everything about Jesus and his mission.
Why this book—and why now?
I wrote this book because I think we’ve lost something.
Not just a book of the Bible, but a critical piece of the story that most of us don’t even know.
We’ve learned to read the New Testament without its foundation.
To talk about Jesus without the categories he lived within.
To celebrate fulfillment without understanding what is being fulfilled.
And in doing so, we’ve emptied the gospel of Leviticus—and our future hope of its promises.
The Forgotten Gospel is my attempt to recover that missing piece.
Not by discovering something new, but by returning to something old.
As old as Sinai.
As old as covenant.
As old as the gospel itself.
An Invitation to Reimagine Leviticus
If Leviticus has ever felt distant to you, you’re not alone. If you’ve wondered why it’s there, or what it has to do with Jesus, you’re asking the right questions.
And if you’ve assumed it no longer matters, because no one has ever shown you why it would—I understand.
But what if that assumption is wrong?
What if the book we forgot is the one that helps us see the gospel more clearly? What if, instead of leaving Leviticus behind, we’re meant to grow into it? What if we need to reimagine Leviticus?
That’s the question that started this journey, and it’s the one that led me to write The Forgotten Gospel.
Some stories deserve to be remembered. Leviticus is one of them.
Banks of a River
You don’t always notice the banks of a river. Only later, when you emerge downstream and catch your breath from the surging journey, do you realize something has been holding it all together.
“I wanna hold you close but never hold you back,
just like the banks do the river.”
You don’t always notice the banks of a river.
You first notice the current, the pull, the way it carries you somewhere you didn’t plan to go.
Only later, when you emerge downstream and catch your breath from the surging journey, do you realize something has been holding it all together.
Long before I ever typed a single word of The Forgotten Gospel, my husband knew I would write a book.
Back when our house was full of babies and toddlers, he would take them out—to the park, the store, anywhere—just so I could sit in the quiet and write my little hobby blog. I didn’t have a following. (I still don’t.) What I write doesn’t make us any money.
But he knew it mattered. “I’m telling you. You’re going to write a book one day,” he’d say. And I’d laugh. “About what? No one cares what I have to say.”
He never argued. He just watched the years go by as I filled notebooks with Bible study charts and references. Watched as I read theologians far beyond my depth while making dinner. He’d tidy the papers piled up around my desk—notes spilling like water over the edges, books emerging from a sea of papers, like a sandbar in a river.
He never once complained about the mess or questioned the hours. He never doubted the Bible studies I led or the materials I wrote myself. He never asked why I put so much effort into something that lived only a hard drive or ended up in someone’s recycle bin.
Three Christmases ago, he gave me a small box. Inside was a brand-new MacBook Air. I could have cried. For years, I had worked on a twelve-year-old laptop—slow and glitchy with sticky keys and failing battery. But it ran, and with four kids, there are always more pressing needs. It never even crossed my mind to ask for new computer.
When I asked him why he would do such a thing, he said, “Because what you write is important. You’re important. It brings me joy to give you the tools to do the work God puts on your heart.”
He has been my cheerleader when things went well, and my shelter when they didn’t. When I came home discouraged after being dismissed, humiliated, or laughed out of the room for what I believe, he was the one who anchored me when everything in me wanted to drift back into the shallow waters. He’d lift up my head and remind me why I had waded out into those deep parts in the first place.
That’s Mike. It’s all or nothing with him. There is no middle ground. He moves toward hard things without hesitation, thrives when the odds are stacked against us, and somehow, in the eleventh hour, he finds a way forward—even when it matters to no one but us. Especially then. And how a nerd like me ended up with a cool guy like him, I will never understand.
When I began writing The Forgotten Gospel in the fall of 2024, I wasn’t trying to write a book. I sat down to make notes for a small group. We were studying Leviticus, and I thought we needed one extra session: “Why Jesus Doesn’t Replace Leviticus.”
Three hours later, I looked up from the computer. Those notes had become a river of their own, and I realized that I wasn’t writing notes anymore. Mike walked into the kitchen and asked what I was working on. “I think I’m writing a book,” I said, stunned at the pages in front of me.
He smiled, kissed the top of my head, and said, “Told you!”
He’s been right all along.
This man has championed my writing forever and funded this project without hesitation—being both the banks of the river and, quite literally, the bank.
And its been his great joy to do so. He has treated my book as though its a precious offering, and that bringing these words into the world is his privilege. He’s read every draft and listened to me talk (endlessly) about Leviticus. He built this website, took the pictures, researched independent publishing. But mostly, he has been the banks that held the current of this book—bearing its weight with me, steady when the pace quickened and the inspiration surged like rapids—and to say I couldn’t have written this book without him is an understatement.
Somehow, he saw the words inside me long before I ever did. He understands the burden I carry like no one else. And long ago, he braced his own heart for the cost of carrying it with me. He has met me here in the work—undaunted by the vision, unthreatened by the voice, unwavering in his love.
So whatever good this book carries, it carries him with it too.
He’s the banks of this river—streadfast on the edges—holding it all in place…for as long as it takes.
His fingerprints are on every page, even if his name isn’t.
The Light of Torah
Most Christians have never been told that the word Torah doesn't mean "law." It means instruction. Direction. The kind of teaching a father gives a child he loves — not to burden them, but to form them.
The words below belong to my friend Sergio DeSoto—a Jewish believer, and author and editor of SergioDesoto.com, an incredible blog dedicated to serious conversations about faith. Sergio carries a deep love for the Torah and a thoughtful, lived perspective on how it shapes his life as a follower of Yeshua. I asked him to speak directly to Christians about a question that has shaped so much of my own work: What is the Christian relationship to the Torah?
I have learned a great deal from Sergio, and I’m honored to share his words here. Read them with an open heart—and a willingness to see what you may have missed.
Most Christians have never been told that the word Torah doesn't mean "law."
It means instruction. Direction. The kind of teaching a father gives a child he loves — not to burden them, but to form them. When God gave Israel His Torah at Sinai, He wasn't handing down a penal code. He was giving a rescued people the shape of life with Him. Holiness. Justice. Worship. Covenant. The categories that hold everything else together.
But somewhere along the way, the church began treating Torah as the thing Jesus came to fix.
That is a serious mistake. And it has cost the church more than most believers realize.
What Yeshua Was Actually Confronting
Read the Gospels again — slowly, without the filter of what you were taught He was doing — and something becomes obvious. Yeshua never once rebuked obedience to God's commandments. Not once.
He rebuked hypocrisy. He confronted religious theater — leaders who loved the appearance of holiness but neglected justice, mercy, and faithfulness. He went after systems that crushed ordinary people under the weight of man-made traditions while the leaders who built those systems exempted themselves.
When He clashed with the religious establishment, He did not say, "Stop obeying the Father." He said something far more dangerous:
You have abandoned the commandment of God and are holding to human tradition (Mark 7:8, paraphrased).
Catch that. The problem was not that people were following God's instruction. The problem was that religious leaders had buried God's instruction under layers of their own authority — and then called the whole pile sacred.
Yeshua did not come to liberate people from God's word. He came to expose those who had made God's word unrecognizable.
The Uncomfortable Paradox
Here is where it gets uncomfortable for a lot of sincere believers.
What many Christians now dismiss as outdated or irrelevant — the Torah, the commandments, the covenant framework of the Hebrew Scriptures — is exactly what Yeshua upheld, lived inside, and taught from. He kept Shabbat. He observed the feasts. He taught from Moses and the Prophets. He quoted Deuteronomy to the adversary in the wilderness.
He did not treat Torah as a rough draft that needed correcting. He treated it as His Father's voice — and He walked in it perfectly.
So when the church says Torah is finished, they are not following Yeshua's example. They are contradicting it. Not out of malice, usually. Out of inheritance. Generations of teaching have framed Torah as the failed first attempt and grace as the real answer, as though God needed two tries to get it right.
But that framing does not come from Scripture. It comes from centuries of theology that slowly — and sometimes deliberately — severed Jesus from His Jewish world.
My Own Turning Point
I used to think the same way.
When I heard the word "law," my mind went straight to bondage. Old covenant. Something heavy that Jesus lifted. I had inherited an entire story where Torah was the problem and the cross was the solution to Torah. Grace meant freedom from God's instructions, and obedience sounded suspiciously like earning something you were supposed to receive for free.
Then I stopped reading the Bible as a religion book and started reading it as covenant history. Not a collection of spiritual principles organized by topic. Not a devotional resource. A record of God binding Himself to a people, speaking to them in real time, forming them through instruction, warning them through prophets, and relentlessly holding the door open for return.
That single shift changed everything. I stopped asking, "What does my tradition say this means?" and started asking, "What did this mean to the people who first received it?" And the moment I asked that question honestly, the categories I had inherited started collapsing.
Torah was not bondage. It was the marriage covenant between God and His people. The "New Covenant" in Jeremiah 31 was not a replacement — it was a promise to write the same Torah on their hearts. Paul was not arguing against obedience — he was arguing against the idea that Gentiles had to become ethnically Jewish to enter the covenant. The entire story was one story, and I had been reading it as two.
The lights didn't go off. They came on.
What Gets Lost
When Yeshua is disconnected from Torah, the church doesn't just lose a theological category. It loses the ability to understand its own Scriptures.
"Kingdom of God" loses its covenant texture — it becomes a vague spiritual destination instead of the reign of Israel's promised King. "Lamb of God" becomes a metaphor instead of the fulfillment of a sacrificial system that God Himself designed. "Repentance" gets reduced to feeling sorry instead of what the Hebrew concept actually means: return — covenantal turning back to the God you walked away from.
And "grace" — the word Christians love most — gets pitted against obedience, as though God's kindness and God's instruction are enemies. That split is completely foreign to the biblical world. Torah is grace. It was the gift of a faithful God to a people He had already rescued. He didn't give them instructions to earn His love. He gave them instructions because He loved them. Deuteronomy 6 is not a contract. It is a father telling His children how to stay close.
Even the New Testament becomes harder to read honestly. Paul gets cast as anti-Torah — the apostle who finally set people free from all those rules. But Paul kept the feasts. Paul took a Nazirite vow in Acts 21. Paul told Timothy that all Scripture — which at that point meant the Tanakh, the Hebrew Bible — is God-breathed and useful for instruction. He was not dismantling Torah. He was arguing that Gentiles enter the covenant through Messiah, not through ethnic conversion. That is a radically different claim than "Torah is over."
When you strip all of that away, you don't get a cleaner gospel. You get a Christ who floats above His own story — still beloved, still quoted, but severed from the world that gave His words their meaning.
A Word About What This Feels Like
I need to say this plainly, because it rarely gets said in Christian spaces.
Torah was not a burden inflicted on Israel. It was a gift entrusted to them. When Christians speak of it as bondage, as failure, as something expired — it lands hard on those of us for whom this is not abstract theology. It is our story. Our covenant. The revelation God entrusted to our fathers.
It can feel like the church wants the Jewish Messiah but not the Jewish story that gave Him context. It can sound — even when no one intends it — like contempt dressed in theological language.
I am not saying this to guilt anyone. I am saying it because if the body of Messiah is going to mature, it has to reckon with this. You cannot claim to honor the root while dismissing what the root produced. Romans 11 is not a footnote. It is a warning: do not be arrogant toward the branches. The Gentile church was grafted into Israel's olive tree — not planted in its own garden.
Read Again — But Read Honestly
I am not asking anyone to become Jewish. I am not asking anyone to abandon their church or torch their theology overnight.
I am asking something simpler and harder: read again.
Read the Bible as one story — not two Testaments in tension, but one covenant unfolding. Read Torah not as the thing Jesus replaced, but as the foundation He built on. Read the apostles not as founders of a new religion, but as Jewish witnesses to the fulfillment of promises that were Jewish from the beginning. Stop assuming Torah is the villain. Stop calling legalism what God called instruction. Let the text challenge the system you inherited, and see whether the roots have something to say that your tradition trained you not to hear.
Because if the Torah was good enough for Yeshua to live by, to teach from, and to die fulfilling — then maybe the question is not why some of us take it seriously. Maybe the question is why so many were taught not to.
The Torah was never the darkness. In many ways, it is the lamp most Christians were taught not to look at.
When you read Scripture as covenant history instead of inherited religion, the lights do not go off.
They come on.
Selah.
When you hear the word "Torah," what is your first instinct — and who taught you to react that way? If Yeshua lived inside Torah and never spoke against it, what does it mean that His church treats it as obsolete? What would change in your faith if you stopped reading the Bible as two books and started reading it as one?
Shalom v'shalvah. Your brother in the Way,
Sergio
I’m grateful for voices like Sergio’s in this conversation. If his words have resonated with you as deeply as they have with me, you explore more of his work and support what he’s building here: www.sergiodesoto.com.
Copyright © Sergio DeSoto. All rights reserved. You are welcome to share this essay freely with proper attribution. Do not reproduce, alter, or monetize without written permission.
The Gospel of Shabbat
Light flickers from the candles. Smiling faces come together, hands of the oldest generation rest gently upon the heads of the children.
Light flickers from the candles. Smiling faces come together, hands of the oldest generation rest gently upon the heads of the children. A psalm is read, a blessing pronounced. The table glows—bread braided and golden from the oven, pomegranate juice gleaming like a ruby beside it. What a royal heritage we’ve been invited into.
I set down the last dish. The table is ready. A feast, a celebration of what awaits.
For several years now, our Friday nights have looked something like this. They are not always elaborate. Sometimes it’s soup or barbecue, or even take-out when sickness hits the household without warning. Some weeks we crowd the dining room with family or friends. Other weeks it’s just me and the kids, five tired faces praying for dad who is far away. There’s usually a spill. Always a mess.
But every Friday night, in our own small way, we join millions across millennia in the longest-held tradition in human history: remembering the Sabbath.
An Experiment in Faith
For us, Friday night shabbat dinner began as an experiment in obedience and faith. Truthfully, I spent most of my life ignoring this commandment. The sabbath is established on the first page of Scripture (Gen. 2:1-3), repeated in the Ten Commandments (Ex. 20:8-11), and carried on throughout the Bible and a flashpoint in Jesus’s own ministry. Yet none of that translated into practice for me. It simply wasn’t part of my faith or my weekly rhythm.
Like many Christians, I assumed Sunday had replaced the sabbath. I believed God had freed us from the old commands, and that attending church—when it was convenient—was good enough. Somehow, in my mind, agreeing that rest was a good idea replaced the need to obey the command to keep the day holy.
Looking back, I now see how shallow that understanding was. Not only was it unbiblical, it also reflected an incredible immaturity on my part. I still lament the many shabbats I missed because of it!
As I write about shabbat now, I find that my understanding of it is shaped less by what the Bible says and more by my own lived experience of it. Our family honors shabbat now because we have grown to love it—not simply because God commanded it. And I think that says something profound about its intent.
When Jesus was criticized for his sabbath practices, he responded,
“The sabbath was made for man, not man for the sabbath.”
(Mark 2:27)
In other words, the sabbath was never meant to be a burdensome religious rule, as some of the Torah scholars of Jesus’s day had made it. It was a gift.
God gave the sabbath to Israel as an everlasting sign of his covenant. To them he said, remember this day and keep it special. But despite what I had heard through many years in church, Scripture never suggests Gentiles are forbidden from sharing in that gift.
In fact, the prophets celebrate Gentile participation in the Sabbath. Isaiah even highlights it as something God delights to see among the nations.
Christians are often quick to point out that the apostles never commanded Gentile believers to observe Shabbat. But they also never discouraged it. The earliest Gentile believers came to faith within Jewish communities where sabbath rhythms were a normal part of following Jesus. The apostles simply refused to let anyone judge Gentiles over how they honored particular days (Rom. 14:5–6; Col. 2:16). Their understanding of shabbat came from the prophets—a vision of joy, delight, and devotion to the Lord. Acts recalls many stories of Gentiles being welcomed into that practice.
What I Expected — And What I Found
When we first began practicing shabbat, I assumed I would learn how to rest. I imagined a busy Friday of finishing tasks and preparing food, followed by a Saturday of slower pace and quiet joy—a simple “day off” with the Lord. That sounded spiritual enough.
But that wasn’t what I discovered.
Life with four children makes it difficult to stop anything. I wrestled with the tension of trying to be “off” while my life still very much required me to be “on” as a parent. But slowly, as we relaxed into simply doing our best to set the day apart, something deeper began to take shape in our home. Something that dismantled my Americanized ideas about “self-care,” productivity rhythms, or a religious pause.
Sabbath—the ceasing of creation—began to create something in us.
It cultivated watchfulness. Anticipation. It formed a habit of inviting the presence of God into our family life in ways that felt tangible and real.
Preparing for shabbat requires intention. Finishing six days of work forces me to steward the hours leading up to Friday night carefully. It calls for diligence, not only in completing tasks, but in tending to the spiritual atmosphere of our home.
Shabbat requires me to check the climate of my own heart, to the hearts of the people entrusted to my care. I began paying closer attention to the way our household reflects Eden—welcoming, peaceful, cultivated, guarded with care. Preparing is not merely about stopping work.
It is practice for life in the kingdom.
The Rest That Awaits
In that rhythm of preparation, a holy restlessness began to grow in me.
Each week as we ready the table, we find ourselves eager for shabbat to arrive. We wait for the moment when the bread breaks, the cup glimmers, and we remember what it all points toward.
More and more, I find myself longing for the greater feast still ahead—the day when we will sit at the table of the Lamb with the family of Abraham, celebrating the arrival of the Prince of Shalom. The laughter of the holy family will rise like music as the long story of God finds its rest. Then the king will rise among us. Just as Jewish fathers have done for generations, he will raise the bread toward heaven and bless the God of Israel, the giver of life:
Baruch atah Adonai, Eloheinu Melech ha-olam,
hamotzi lechem min ha-aretz.
Blessed are you, Lord our God, King of the universe,
who brings forth bread from the earth.
The words, whispered over tables for thousands of years—through sorrow and hope, over every scavenged sabbath crumb that kept the promise alive in times of darkness—will reach their fullest meaning.
The one who spoke us into being will stand before us as the bread itself. Grasping it with his scarred hands, he will break the loaf. And I think, in that moment, I will break too.
Every Friday night when we break the bread and hear the ancient words spoken again, I feel a quiet swell of that future.
Shabbat, I have learned, is not merely a weekly pause. It marks an end and a beginning. Like our Creator, we look back on the week and reflect on the ways we have cultivated goodness and beauty. But more than that, we begin to anticipate the future—the day when the work of our hands will reach its fullness.
Our table is set beautifully. Our home is open to whoever God may bring through the door. Not because we are trying to impress anyone with lavish hospitality, but because welcoming shabbat means welcoming the presence of Yahweh into our home.
But it is not we who invite God into our rest. Its God who invites us into his.
The Gospel of Shabbat
Shabbat is more than a day off work or a chance to reconnect with family.
It is a divine gift—a sanctuary in time—where the Creator invites us to celebrate what is good and enter the joy of a God who finishes his work. It trains our hearts to long for the world redeemed.
It teaches us to look forward to the day when the kingdom comes to the land and all creation is ordered under the reign of the long-awaited king.
Some say grace has freed us from Shabbat. I say shabbat is the living expression of grace itself. For one day each week you intentionally do nothing—and God still loves you. Why would anyone want to be freed from that?
We rest because the world does not ultimately depend on us. We rest because God will finish his work.
I cannot imagine our family without Shabbat now. Week after week, year after year, the Lord has used this sacred day to preach his gospel to us.
Through Shabbat he has taught our family to remember who we are, to whom we belong, and what we are saved for: the rest of God that waits at the end of all things.
“If you call the Sabbath a delight,
the Lord’s holy day honorable...
then you shall take delight in the Lord,
and I will make you ride on the heights of the land
and feed you with the heritage of Jacob.”
The Gospel in Stars and Sand
On a quiet night in the ancient Near East, an old man stood beneath a sky filled with stars he could never count and staked everything on a promise he could not see.
On a quiet night in the ancient Near East, an old man stood beneath a sky filled with stars he could never count and staked everything on a promise he could not see. The silence broke with God’s voice: “Look toward heaven, and number the stars, if you are able to number them… so shall your offspring be” (Gen. 15:5).
Abraham could not number them. Who could? Yet beneath the stars, he relied on God's promise that he and his barren wife would have a family so abundant, it would bless all others. Scripture records it simply: “And he believed the LORD, and He counted it to him as righteousness” (Gen. 15:6).
That was the gospel Abraham heard.
Not a three-step formula.
Not an altar call or a fiery warning to avoid hell.
It was the announcement of God’s intention to bless the nations through his family, and the invitation to believe that promise.
The Gospel of Personal Salvation
The message that first brought me to faith sounded very different:
Admit you are a sinner. Believe in Jesus. Commit your life to serving him.
I am deeply grateful for that message. It pointed me to Jesus and started me on the path of following him. But it is not the same gospel Abraham believed.
Throughout the New Testament, Abraham is held up as the model of faith. Again and again, the apostles return to him as the benchmark of righteousness. Abraham was counted righteous not because of who he was or what he did, but because of his belief.
Which raises the question: What, precisely, did Abraham believe?
The Gospel Preached in Advance
It was not belief in Jesus as we know him. Abraham did not pray to Jesus, worship him, or believe in his future sacrifice. Yet God counted him righteous.
Why? Because Abraham trusted the promise God proclaimed to him: that through his family, all the nations of the earth would be blessed. He believed God would do what he said.
Paul later reflects on this moment in Galatians:
“The Scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, preached the gospel beforehand to Abraham, saying, ‘In you shall all the nations be blessed’” (Gal. 3:8).
Paul is unmistakably clear: Abraham heard the gospel.
That same gospel runs like a thread through Israel’s story—reiterated at Sinai, expanded in David’s kingdom, and carried forward as hope through the many exiles the Jewish people have endured. Jesus himself tied Abraham’s faith to his own mission:
“Your father Abraham rejoiced that he would see my day. He saw it and was glad” (John 8:56).
Abraham never saw Jesus of Nazareth. Yet he rejoiced in the day—the era when God’s promises would reach fulfillment. He trusted the one who spoke, without knowing every detail of how the promise would unfold. That lack of detail did not diminish his joy.
Abraham’s faith rested in the confidence that God’s word could not fail.
When the Gospel Gets Too Small
The standard Evangelical gospel of salvation is sincere and well-intentioned. It has transformed countless lives, including my own.
But it reduces the story of God to begin and end with the individual. In this telling, Jesus appears almost out of thin air, detached from Israel’s identity, offering a faith centered primarily on personal improvement—Jesus as a motivating best friend, God as a life-coach, Scripture as a self-help book.
Severed from Abraham’s promise, Jesus is reduced to past accomplishments, as though dying for sin and improving our lives is the total sum of his mission.
That gospel collapses under the weight of Scripture’s story.
If our gospel no longer begins with the God of Abraham—the God who bound himself by covenant to people, land, and the restoration of all things—then we are falling for a different gospel and placing our faith a God Abraham never knew.
God alone cut the covenant with Abraham, passing between the pieces of flesh severed beneath the oaks of Mamre, in the shadow of Jerusalem—God’s holy hill. From that moment forward, the future of the world was tethered to a promise God alone swore to keep. And when Jesus arrived announcing the closeness of that promise, he taught of a specific kingdom—a kingdom anchored fully in Israel’s covenant story and eschatological hope. He commanded this good news be proclaimed from Jerusalem, to Judea and Samaria, and to the ends of the earth.
Any message that ignores that kingdom’s covenantal center has drifted from the gospel Jesus preached and misrepresents the God it claims to reveal.
Through Abraham’s seed, on Abraham’s land, Abraham’s blessing would heal the world. Even Ishmael and Esau stood within the horizon of that mercy—brothers invited to reconciliation, blessed by the promises sworn to their fathers.
Justified by Trust in God’s Promises
No one is declared righteous by bloodline, legal status, or even vague belief in Jesus. What does it mean to “believe in Jesus as your personal savior”? Savior of what? Salvation to what? Evidenced by what? This is why Paul grounds justification in faith like Abraham’s.
The apostles’ taught that like Abraham, we are counted righteous not by who we are, but by trusting in God’s promises. We believe God will do what he said. Today these promises are still unfolding, moving toward ultimate fulfillment in the reign of Messiah, Abraham’s seed, through whom the nations will be blessed. And we cannot believe these things if we do not first know them.
Jesus is not the conclusion of these promises. He is their guarantee.
His resurrection stands as living proof that God’s word to Abraham cannot fail. Faith in that is the faith Scripture calls righteousness.
Recovering the Full Gospel
A gospel centered on God’s enduring oath to Abraham substantiates our faith. It declares—without apology—that God will keep his covenant and that the promised descendant will lead Abraham’s family into faithfulness.
That message carries a sharpness disciples of Jesus desperately need as we divide truth from error in a world struggling to locate its hope.
The standard gospel, though familiar and winsome, collapses under the weight of Abraham’s story. It leaves large portions of Scripture unopened and has little use for the oath God sealed by blood beneath the stars of Canaan.
Worst of all, it teaches us to believe salvation is about us—that Jesus exists primarily to meet our needs and carry us to heaven when we die.
But the gospel is not about us.
God’s promise was not given to me. It was given to Abraham. Real faith trusts that God intends to keep all his promises—to Abraham, to Israel, and to the nations. Not vaguely. Not merely “spiritually.” Not in some distant world foreign to the prophets and apostles. But here—through the people God chose, in the land he named, led by the Messiah he promised, who will raise his people to immortality and lead the restoration of all things.
If this is not the message we are proclaiming to our friends and neighbors, we must recalibrate toward Abraham’s hope. Otherwise, we find ourselves bearing false witness to the Most High God and having so quickly deserted the truth for a different gospel.
Under the Starry Sky
Beneath the stars, with nothing to his name and no proof to go on, Abraham believed—not only in Messiah’s birth, death, or resurrection, but in the day when God would do what he said.
We live on the other side of the cross, with more clarity than Abraham could have imagined. Yet God’s work in the world is still unfinished. We wait, aching for the peace envisioned by the prophets.
Different gospels will not survive these darkening days.
The world we inhabit—and our participation in the blessings still to come—requires more. It demands the kind of faith that stakes everything on a future yet unseen.
Our hope is in the day Abraham’s starry sky is split open, when the great Cloud-Rider comes bringing every promise with him.
Like Abraham, we number the stars and sift the sand. We order our lives around the certainty that God will keep his word.
That promise is very good news.